Slimdx

I’ve been working on some graphics work using SlimDx. I really like the library but the documentation is sparse in some places

ScribeFire and formatting code

Apparently ScribeFire doesn’t do C# source code formatting very well.

Trying to wrap my head around applicative order Y Combinators

… and my head hurts

An Adventure in Function Pointers, Delegates, and Calling Conventions

I’ve been interfacing a third-party library for a project at work. The third party library is a DLL with a C interface. Now most libraries for Windows usually have  a __stdcall calling conventions and for some reason I assumed that would be case with the C library. I guess it was because the demo application had  not done anything to give a hint otherwise. Since the client component was going to be in .net component, I wrote a nice little C++/CLI wrapper around the unmanaged native library, so that I could easily call it from C#. I decided against using P/Invoke because I don’t like using meta-information in source code to identify implementation of interfaces. In my opinion using P/Invoke client code too dependent on a specific library. That’s a topic for another post.

One of the functions of the library needed a function pointer to a callback function. The prototype of the function was something like this, wrapped with linkage.

extern "C"
{
    typedef void (*SomeCallbackType)(int, char*, float);
    void SetCallBackInNativeFunction(SomeCallbackType p){/*...*/}
}

Since I wanted the callback mechanism to hook up to .Net delegates I did something as follows,

using namespace System;
using namespace System::Runtime::InteropServices;

delegate void FooDelegate(int arg1, char* arg2, float arg3);

ref class AClass
{
    ///...
public:
    void FooCallback(int arg1, char *arg2, float arg3){/*...*/}
    ///..
};

static GCHandle globalGCHandle;

void SetCallback()
{
    AClass ^theObj = gcnew AClass();
    FooDelegate ^del = gcnew FooDelegate(theObj, &AClass::FooCallback);
    //We want to do this because the callback will be called many times.
    //and may live through many garbage collection sprees.
    //This would be freed at the end of the program.
    globalGCHandle = GCHandle::Alloc(del); 

    IntPtr ptr2Func = Marshal::GetFunctionPointerForDelegate(del);

    SetCallBackInNativeFunction((SomeCallbackType)ptr2Func.ToPointer());
}

Now every time time I ran my program, it would start up normally, but then mysteriously crash with really exceptions like 0xC00005, 0xC0000013, etc. I recognized these exceptions that indicated access violation and stack corruption exceptions. I turned on exception handlers in the debugger but the debugger refused to catch those exceptions. I was mystified. I thought that the exceptions were happening because the garbage collector was moving around my delegate, which is why  I used the globalGCHandle = GCHandle::Alloc(del). That didn’t help. Turned out the program was crashing because Marshal::GetFunctionPointerForDelegate returns a function pointer with __stdcall calling convention. Now as everyone knows __stdcall and __cdecl (the default in C compilers) are incompatible, and it causes really confusing errors because the somehow or the other the stack always ends up corrupted. The compiler (at least VC compiler) would have helped had I been passing a native function pointer. With managed code, the compiler happily let me shoot myself in the foot. The solution was to add the following attribute to delegate declaration

[UnmanagedFunctionPointer(CallingConvention::Cdecl)]
delegate void FooDelegate(int arg1, char* arg2, float arg3);

which I got from here

The program worked flawlessly after that (I mean it did what I wanted it to do).

 

IronPython and/or F#

I’ve been working with a large project that has a lot of unmanaged MFC and C++ code, and new managed code using C#, C++/CLI with a many third-party libraries written in unmanaged code. Because of the complexity of the code, and sheer number of projects (>50 at the last count), I’ve been debating on using some scripting language to prototype and test code. I know Python, so I’ve started off with that. Unfortunately, Visual Studio 2005 does not have a good integration with the IronPython console. I tried getting the add-in sample to integrate with Visual Studio, but after wasting a few hours decided to use it without intellisense.

F# on the other hand has pretty good integration wit a REPL console, compiler and interpreter. Although, I know some functional programming,  (doing some programming in Lisp, Haskell, and Boost.(Lambda|Bind|Spirit) in C++), F# seems to have an alien syntax. I’m pretty sure that after a few hours, I should get the hang of it. Probably, next weekend. Although its looking more and more likely that I’ll be at work this weekend again.

I do like this T-shirt though.

Brought to you via here.

 

sidenote:

I wish plain old C enums played nicely with CLS enums, or that I was smart enough to remember the nuances of how they differ.

Finally …

… some respite. The project I was working was finally demo’ed today. It was successful. I’m on the demo high right now, but I think I will have some more time to blog about other topics. My next project is to find a nice thunking library to convert C++ member functions so that they can be passed to a function that has a pointer to a C function.

Using Boost::Bind and Boost::Function for Windows Procedure Functions

The experiment failed. What was I thinking? I forgot that C++ member functions have an implicit this pointer, that makes them pretty useless as function pointers. Oh well… Onto finding a good thunking library … Who woulda thunk?

Static Data …

I came across this blog post about the evils of static data via here.

I agree with everything the blog post states but how would you program singletons without static data?

Installing the Visual Studio Express Editions « Bit By Bit, Byte by Byte, Word by Word

 

Installing the Visual Studio Express Editions « Bit By Bit, Byte by Byte, Word by Word. After playing around with the express versions, I think I’m going to have to fork over $270 to Microsoft for the standard edition. The express versions are severely limited with what they can do, and since I use Visual Studio so much I might as well buy the damn thing.

Installing the Visual Studio Express Editions

I’m installing the express editions right now. As much as I like the environment, I’m just not willing to fork over $200+ for the standard edition. If it works, Great!! Otherwise not so great, and I will cough up the money. That $600 rebate might have come in handy right now.